Best Salesforce Alternatives 2026

Most companies don’t leave Salesforce because it’s a bad product. They leave because the total cost and complexity of running it has outpaced the value they’re getting. I’ve helped teams migrate off Salesforce where the annual spend had quietly grown to $250K+ for a 50-person sales team — and half the features they were paying for sat unused.

If you’re reading this, you’ve probably hit one of those inflection points: a renewal quote that made your CFO wince, a realization that you need a full-time admin just to keep the lights on, or a frustration that your reps are still logging notes in spreadsheets because the CRM is too complicated.

Why Look for Salesforce Alternatives?

The true cost is never just the license fee. Salesforce Enterprise Edition lists at $165/user/month, but that’s the starting line. Add Einstein AI ($50/user/month), CPQ ($75/user/month), Pardot for marketing ($1,250/month), additional data storage at $125/GB/month beyond your allocation, and sandbox environments for testing. A 50-user deployment with these additions easily runs $180,000-$300,000/year before you factor in implementation partner fees, which typically range from $50,000-$150,000 for an initial build-out.

You need specialized talent to run it. Salesforce administrators command $85,000-$120,000/year in most U.S. markets. Salesforce developers — the people who write Apex triggers and Lightning components — cost $120,000-$160,000. If you don’t have this talent in-house, you’re relying on consulting partners at $150-$300/hour. For a mid-market company with 30-100 users, this overhead is disproportionate.

Customization creates technical debt. Every Apex trigger, every custom Visualforce page, every workflow rule accumulates. I’ve audited Salesforce orgs with 200+ workflow rules where nobody could confidently explain what half of them did. When Salesforce pushes major releases three times a year, someone has to regression-test all of it. Many companies discover they’ve built a custom application on top of Salesforce that’s expensive to maintain and risky to modify.

The integration tax is real. Need marketing automation? That’s Pardot or Marketing Cloud — separate products with separate pricing. Customer service? Service Cloud, additional license. E-commerce? Commerce Cloud. Each addition multiplies complexity. Many competitors bundle these capabilities into a single platform at a fraction of the cost.

User adoption remains stubbornly low. Salesforce’s own data suggests average CRM adoption rates hover around 26%. In my experience, even well-implemented Salesforce orgs see 60-75% meaningful adoption. The interface has improved with Lightning, but it still feels overwhelming for reps who just want to log calls and move deals through a pipeline.

HubSpot CRM

Best for: Mid-market companies wanting strong marketing-sales alignment without dedicated admins

HubSpot is the most common destination I see for companies leaving Salesforce, particularly in the 20-200 employee range. The core value proposition is simple: you get a CRM that marketing and sales teams actually enjoy using, with dramatically lower total cost of ownership. HubSpot’s free tier isn’t a gimmick — it includes contact management, deal tracking, email tracking, and meeting scheduling for unlimited users. Most companies I’ve worked with start seeing real value before they pay a dime.

Where HubSpot genuinely outperforms Salesforce is the marketing-to-sales handoff. Because marketing automation lives inside the same database (not a bolted-on product like Pardot), your sales reps see every page visit, email open, and form submission on the contact timeline without any sync configuration. HubSpot’s content tools, landing pages, and email marketing are included in Marketing Hub — capabilities that would require separate Salesforce products and middleware to replicate. For B2B companies running inbound marketing, this integration alone justifies the switch.

The honest limitation: HubSpot’s data model is less flexible than Salesforce’s. Custom objects exist now, but they don’t match Salesforce’s depth for complex relationships. If you have a multi-entity business — say, tracking assets across accounts with custom junction objects and complex roll-up summaries — HubSpot will frustrate you. Reporting has improved significantly, but custom report types in Salesforce still offer more granularity. Enterprise-scale companies with 500+ sales reps and complex territory management will find HubSpot’s current tools insufficient.

Pricing clarity is a genuine advantage. Sales Hub Professional at $100/user/month gets you sequences, forecasting, custom reporting, and playbooks. There’s no surprise storage fee, no per-API-call limit that suddenly caps your integrations. For a 50-user sales team with marketing needs, HubSpot typically costs 40-60% less than an equivalent Salesforce setup. The main pricing gotcha: Marketing Hub charges by marketing contacts, so a 100,000-contact database at Professional tier runs around $3,300/month.

See our Salesforce vs HubSpot comparison | Read our full HubSpot review

Microsoft Dynamics 365

Best for: Organizations deeply invested in the Microsoft ecosystem needing enterprise-grade CRM

If your company runs on Microsoft 365, Teams, and Azure, Dynamics 365 is the most natural Salesforce alternative at the enterprise level. The integration depth isn’t just about signing in with the same credentials — it’s about Outlook emails automatically tracked to CRM records, Teams meetings linked to opportunities, SharePoint documents organized by account, and Power BI dashboards pulling CRM data without ETL pipelines. This native connectivity eliminates an entire category of integration projects that Salesforce customers spend $50,000-$100,000 building.

The Power Platform is Dynamics 365’s secret weapon. Power Automate handles workflow automation with a visual builder that replaces Salesforce’s Flow Builder — and extends beyond CRM to automate processes across hundreds of connectors. Power Apps lets you build custom interfaces without the equivalent of hiring a Lightning component developer. Power BI provides analytics that rival Salesforce’s CRM Analytics (formerly Tableau CRM) at a fraction of the add-on cost. For organizations that need custom applications adjacent to their CRM, this ecosystem is compelling.

The limitation that matters: Dynamics 365 implementations are not simpler than Salesforce. The consulting ecosystem is smaller, which can mean fewer choices and higher rates in some regions. The learning curve for administrators is comparable. If you’re leaving Salesforce because of complexity, Dynamics 365 won’t solve that problem — it trades one type of complexity for another. Where it wins is cost efficiency for Microsoft-heavy shops and flexibility for organizations that want to build beyond traditional CRM boundaries.

Pricing works differently than Salesforce’s all-or-nothing approach. You can license Sales Professional ($65/user/month) for core CRM, then add Customer Service ($50-$95/user/month) and Marketing ($1,500/month for 10,000 contacts) independently. This modularity means you’re not paying for Service Cloud seats for reps who never open a case. For a 100-user deployment, Dynamics 365 typically comes in 20-35% below equivalent Salesforce licensing, with the gap widening when you factor in Power Platform capabilities that would require add-ons in Salesforce.

See our Salesforce vs Microsoft Dynamics 365 comparison | Read our full Microsoft Dynamics 365 review

Zoho CRM

Best for: Cost-conscious enterprises wanting deep customization at a fraction of Salesforce pricing

Zoho is the alternative that Salesforce enterprise customers most often underestimate. The perception is “cheap CRM for small businesses,” but Zoho CRM Enterprise at $40/user/month includes custom modules, advanced workflow automation, territory management, multi-scoring rules, and a sandbox environment. For a 50-user team, that’s $24,000/year versus $99,000+ for Salesforce Enterprise — before adding Salesforce’s typical extras.

The Zoho One bundle is where the economics get genuinely hard to argue with. For $45/user/month, you get Zoho CRM plus 45+ applications: project management (Zoho Projects), accounting (Zoho Books), HR management (Zoho People), helpdesk (Zoho Desk), email marketing (Zoho Campaigns), business intelligence (Zoho Analytics), and more. An equivalent Salesforce ecosystem with third-party tools for each of these functions would cost 5-10x more. For mid-market companies that want a unified business platform, Zoho One is the most cost-effective option on the market.

Zoho’s Canvas design studio deserves specific attention. It lets you redesign CRM record pages with a drag-and-drop editor — changing layouts, colors, field arrangements, and conditional display rules without writing code. In Salesforce, equivalent UI customization requires Lightning App Builder for basic changes and custom Lightning components (requiring developer skills) for anything more sophisticated. Canvas puts UI control in the hands of business users.

The honest downside: Zoho’s third-party integration ecosystem is smaller. Salesforce’s AppExchange has 7,000+ apps; Zoho Marketplace has around 1,500. If you rely on niche industry applications that have pre-built Salesforce connectors, check whether Zoho equivalents exist before committing. Zoho’s API is solid, so custom integrations are possible, but they require development effort. Also, Zoho’s enterprise support reputation is mixed — response times on lower-tier plans can be slow, and you may want to budget for Premium Support ($115/user/year) for critical deployments.

See our Salesforce vs Zoho comparison | Read our full Zoho review

Pipedrive

Best for: Sales-focused teams that want visual pipeline management without enterprise overhead

Pipedrive is the anti-Salesforce. Where Salesforce tries to be everything — CRM, platform, marketing suite, analytics engine — Pipedrive does one thing: help sales teams manage deals and close revenue. The pipeline view is genuinely the best in the CRM industry. Drag deals between stages, see aging indicators, get automatic reminders for stalled opportunities. Sales reps understand it in minutes, not weeks.

I’ve seen Pipedrive adoption rates above 90% in teams that previously struggled to get 60% compliance in Salesforce. That adoption gap translates directly to data quality, which translates directly to forecast accuracy. A CRM with perfect features and 60% adoption produces worse data than a simpler CRM with 95% adoption. This is the core argument for Pipedrive: your revenue intelligence is only as good as the data your reps consistently enter.

The AI Sales Assistant analyzes your pipeline and surfaces actionable recommendations: “This deal has been in the proposal stage for 14 days — 3x your average. Consider a follow-up.” In Salesforce, similar functionality requires Einstein licensing at $50/user/month on top of your base subscription. Pipedrive includes it from the Advanced plan at $39/user/month.

Pipedrive’s limitation is clear and important: it’s a sales tool, not a business platform. There’s no native customer service module, no built-in marketing automation beyond basic email campaigns, no CPQ, no custom objects for complex data models. If you need a unified platform for sales, service, and marketing, Pipedrive isn’t it. But if your primary need is a CRM that sales reps will actually use every day — and you’re willing to integrate with separate tools for marketing and support — Pipedrive at $49-$99/user/month replaces Salesforce’s core sales functionality at 50-70% lower cost.

See our Salesforce vs Pipedrive comparison | Read our full Pipedrive review

Freshsales

Best for: Growing companies wanting AI-powered lead scoring and built-in communication tools at mid-market prices

Freshsales (part of the Freshworks suite) is the alternative I recommend most often for companies that want Salesforce-like functionality in a package that doesn’t require a dedicated admin. The built-in phone system is the feature that surprises most evaluators: local and toll-free numbers, call recording, voicemail drops, and automatic call logging — all native, no Twilio or RingCentral integration needed. For inside sales teams, this alone eliminates $30-50/user/month in telephony costs.

Freddy AI, Freshworks’ artificial intelligence engine, provides lead scoring from the Pro plan ($39/user/month). It analyzes engagement signals — email opens, website visits, response patterns — and ranks leads by conversion likelihood. Getting comparable functionality from Salesforce requires Einstein Lead Scoring, which needs Enterprise Edition plus Einstein licensing. The total Salesforce cost for AI-powered lead scoring starts around $215/user/month; Freshsales delivers it for $39.

The Freshworks ecosystem provides a natural expansion path. Freshdesk handles customer support, Freshmarketer covers marketing automation, and Freshservice manages IT services. Data flows between these products natively. It’s not as comprehensive as Salesforce’s ecosystem, but for companies with 20-200 employees, it covers 80% of the use cases at 30% of the cost.

Where Freshsales falls short: complex workflow automation and enterprise reporting. If you need approval processes that span multiple objects, conditional field updates based on related record criteria, or reports that join four or five custom objects — Freshsales isn’t there yet. The custom reporting engine is adequate for standard pipeline and activity metrics but doesn’t match Salesforce’s analytical depth. Companies with complex, multi-departmental sales processes involving CPQ, advanced forecasting, or territory management will find gaps.

See our Salesforce vs Freshsales comparison | Read our full Freshsales review

SugarCRM

Best for: Enterprises needing maximum deployment flexibility including on-premise and private cloud options

SugarCRM occupies a unique niche: it’s one of the few enterprise-grade CRMs still offering on-premise deployment. For companies in regulated industries — financial services, healthcare, defense, government — where data must reside in specific locations or on controlled infrastructure, this option eliminates the compliance headache that Salesforce’s multi-tenant cloud creates. Sugar’s private cloud and on-premise options mean your CRM data stays exactly where your security team dictates.

The time-aware platform is Sugar’s most underappreciated feature. Every field change on every record is automatically tracked with full historical context. Want to see what a deal’s probability was three months ago? What an account’s industry classification was before someone changed it? Sugar stores all of this automatically. In Salesforce, achieving similar functionality requires enabling field history tracking (limited to 20 fields per object) or building custom audit trail solutions.

Sugar Sell at $49/user/month includes workflow automation, reporting, mobile access, and email integration. Sugar Serve handles customer service cases, and Sugar Market covers marketing automation starting at $1,000/month for 10,000 contacts. The modular approach lets you license what you need. For a 75-user deployment, Sugar typically costs 40-55% less than equivalent Salesforce licensing.

The limitation: SugarCRM’s partner and developer ecosystem is substantially smaller than Salesforce’s. Finding experienced Sugar consultants takes longer, and pre-built integrations for niche applications are fewer. If you’re in a standard tech stack (Google/Microsoft, Slack, common marketing tools), this won’t matter. If you need deep integrations with industry-specific platforms, verify availability before committing. Also, Sugar’s user interface, while improved with the Serve and Sell redesign, still doesn’t feel as modern as HubSpot or Pipedrive.

See our Salesforce vs SugarCRM comparison | Read our full SugarCRM review

monday CRM

Best for: Teams wanting CRM tightly integrated with project management and cross-department workflows

monday CRM comes from a different lineage than most Salesforce alternatives. It evolved from monday.com’s work management platform, which means it treats CRM as one type of work within a broader operational system. The killer use case: companies where the sales team closes a deal and then a project team needs to deliver it. In Salesforce, this handoff typically requires a separate project management tool (Asana, Monday, Jira) plus an integration to move data between systems. In monday CRM, the deal converts to a project board within the same platform. No sync. No middleware. No data gaps.

The board-based interface is remarkably flexible. Non-technical users create custom views, automations, and dashboards without admin support. I’ve seen marketing teams, operations teams, and finance teams all working in monday alongside the sales team — each with their own boards but sharing underlying data. This cross-departmental visibility is something Salesforce technically supports but rarely achieves without significant customization.

Automations in monday CRM use a simple “when X happens, do Y” builder that covers most common workflows: auto-assign leads based on territory, notify a manager when a deal exceeds a certain value, move items between boards when status changes. It’s less powerful than Salesforce Flow but dramatically more accessible. Most teams have their automations configured within the first week.

The limitation is significant for large sales organizations: monday CRM lacks advanced forecasting, territory management, CPQ, and the multi-object relational database structure that Salesforce provides. It’s not designed for 500-person sales teams with complex compensation models and hierarchical approval processes. It’s designed for companies where sales is one part of a broader operational workflow — and it excels there.

Pricing is straightforward. The Pro plan at $28/user/month covers most CRM needs including automations, integrations, and time tracking. Enterprise pricing is available on request for advanced security, governance, and audit features. For a 50-user team, monday CRM costs roughly $16,800/year — a fraction of Salesforce.

See our Salesforce vs monday CRM comparison | Read our full monday CRM review

Quick Comparison Table

Tool	Best For	Starting Price	Free Plan
HubSpot CRM	Marketing-sales alignment without dedicated admins	$100/user/mo (Sales Hub Pro)	Yes — unlimited users
Microsoft Dynamics 365	Microsoft-ecosystem enterprises	$65/user/mo (Sales Professional)	No — 30-day trial
Zoho CRM	Maximum value with deep customization	$14/user/mo (Standard)	Yes — up to 3 users
Pipedrive	Sales teams wanting high adoption and visual pipelines	$14/user/mo (Essential)	No — 14-day trial
Freshsales	AI lead scoring with built-in communications	$9/user/mo (Growth)	Yes — up to 3 users
SugarCRM	Regulated industries needing on-premise deployment	$49/user/mo (Sell)	No — 7-day trial
monday CRM	Cross-department workflows blending sales and delivery	$12/user/mo (Basic)	Yes — up to 2 users

How to Choose

Be honest about what’s actually driving the switch. Different motivations point to different solutions.

If cost is the primary driver, Zoho CRM gives you the most functionality per dollar. At Enterprise tier ($40/user/month), it covers 80-90% of what most companies use Salesforce for. Zoho One ($45/user/month) replaces your entire business tool stack — not just CRM. For a 50-user company, that’s potentially $200,000+/year in savings across CRM, marketing, helpdesk, and project management.

If your sales team won’t use Salesforce, switch to Pipedrive or HubSpot. Better adoption with a simpler tool produces better data than low adoption with a powerful tool. Pipedrive is best for pure sales teams; HubSpot is better when marketing alignment matters.

If you’re a Microsoft shop, Dynamics 365 is the natural choice. The native integrations with Outlook, Teams, and Power BI eliminate an entire category of middleware costs. But be realistic: the implementation complexity is comparable to Salesforce, so budget accordingly.

If you need on-premise or private cloud deployment, SugarCRM is your primary option among modern CRMs. It’s the clear choice for regulated industries where data sovereignty isn’t optional.

If deal-to-delivery handoffs are broken, monday CRM bridges the gap between sales and project management better than any other tool. It’s not the most powerful CRM, but it might be the most practical one for service-based businesses.

If you want AI capabilities without the Salesforce AI tax, Freshsales delivers lead scoring, deal insights, and communication analytics from $39/user/month — capabilities that cost $165-$215/user/month in the Salesforce ecosystem.

Switching Tips

Migrating away from Salesforce is a significant project, but it’s not as painful as many people fear. Here’s what I tell every client.

Export your data before you cancel. Salesforce’s Data Export service lets you export all objects as CSV files. Run a full export and store it securely — even after migration, you’ll want the original data as a reference. Pay attention to file attachments and documents; these often require separate export steps through the Content Delivery API.

Map your objects before you choose a tool. List every Salesforce object you actually use — not every object that exists, but the ones with real data and active processes. Most companies discover they use 8-12 objects regularly out of 30+ that were configured. This exercise also reveals which custom fields matter and which were created for a project three years ago and never used again.

Budget 4-8 weeks for a mid-market migration. A 50-user team with standard objects (leads, contacts, accounts, opportunities, cases) can migrate in 4 weeks. Add 2-4 weeks if you have complex custom objects, heavy automation, or integration dependencies. Enterprise migrations (200+ users, complex data models) typically take 3-6 months.

Rebuild automations from scratch. Don’t try to replicate every Salesforce workflow rule and flow in your new tool. Migration is an opportunity to audit your processes. I consistently find that 30-40% of automations in a mature Salesforce org are either redundant, broken, or serving processes that no longer exist. Start with the critical 10-15 automations your business depends on. Add more only as needed.

Run parallel systems for 2-4 weeks. Don’t flip the switch overnight. Run your new CRM alongside Salesforce for a transition period. This lets you verify data integrity, train users gradually, and catch gaps before they become emergencies. Yes, it means paying for both systems temporarily — it’s worth it.

Don’t forget your integrations. Audit every tool connected to Salesforce: marketing automation, accounting software, e-signature tools, data enrichment services, BI platforms. Each one needs to be reconnected to your new CRM. Some will have native connectors; others will need Zapier, Make, or custom API work. Build an integration matrix early and allocate time for each connection.

Set realistic adoption expectations. Your team spent months (or years) learning Salesforce. They’ll need patience and support to learn a new system. Invest in training — not just a single webinar, but role-specific sessions, a resource library, and at least one internal champion per department who can answer questions. The first 30 days after go-live determine long-term adoption success.

---

Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep the site running and produce quality content.