HubSpot vs Copper 2026

HubSpot and Copper get compared constantly by teams running on Google Workspace. The core tension: HubSpot is a full business platform that happens to integrate with Google, while Copper is a CRM built from the ground up to live inside Google apps. That distinction shapes everything — pricing, complexity, adoption speed, and long-term scalability.

Quick Verdict

Choose HubSpot if you need marketing automation, multi-department workflows, or a CRM that can grow with you from 5 to 500 employees. The free plan alone beats most paid CRMs.

Choose Copper if your team of 5–50 people runs everything through Gmail and Google Calendar, and you want the fastest path to CRM adoption with zero friction. Copper’s Google-native experience is genuinely unmatched.

Pricing Compared

The pricing story here is more nuanced than it first appears. Copper looks cheaper at first glance — $9/user/month at the Starter level versus HubSpot’s $20/user/month. But HubSpot’s free plan changes the math entirely for small teams.

A team of 5 reps can use HubSpot CRM for $0/month and get contact management, deal tracking, email logging, and a meeting scheduler. That’s not a stripped-down trial — it’s a genuinely usable CRM. Copper has no free tier, so that same team pays $45/month minimum ($9 × 5 users), and they’re capped at 1,000 contacts.

Where HubSpot gets expensive: The Professional tier jumps to $100/user/month ($500/month for a team of 5), and that’s just Sales Hub. If you add Marketing Hub Professional ($890/month) or Service Hub, costs compound fast. A 10-person team using Sales and Marketing Hub Professional can easily hit $2,000–$3,000/month.

Where Copper stays affordable: Even at the Business tier ($99/user/month), Copper’s total cost for a 10-person team is $990/month. There’s no separate marketing hub to bolt on. The downside is you’ll eventually need separate tools for marketing automation, service ticketing, and content management — and those costs add up too.

My pricing recommendation: For teams under 10 people who just need sales CRM, start with HubSpot’s free plan. If you outgrow it and your team is deeply embedded in Google Workspace, Copper Professional at $23/user/month is strong value. For teams planning to scale past 25 people or needing marketing automation, HubSpot’s ecosystem saves money long-term despite higher per-seat costs.

One hidden cost worth flagging: HubSpot charges onboarding fees for Professional ($500) and Enterprise ($3,000) tiers. Copper doesn’t, but many teams end up paying for a few hours of consultant time to set up their automations properly anyway.

Where HubSpot Wins

All-in-One Platform Depth

HubSpot isn’t just a CRM — it’s a business operating system. Marketing Hub handles email campaigns, landing pages, social media, and ad tracking. Service Hub covers ticketing and knowledge bases. Content Hub manages your website. No other CRM in this price range offers that breadth.

For a growing company, this matters enormously. A marketing lead captured through a HubSpot form flows into the CRM, gets nurtured by automated email sequences, converts into a deal tracked by the sales team, and becomes a support ticket if something goes wrong — all within one database. With Copper, you’d need 3–4 separate tools to replicate that journey.

Automation That Actually Scales

HubSpot’s workflow engine is genuinely powerful. You can build multi-step, branching automations that trigger across departments. A deal hitting “Closed Won” can automatically create a project in your onboarding pipeline, notify the customer success team, enroll the customer in an onboarding email sequence, and update their lifecycle stage — all from one workflow.

Copper’s automations handle the basics: task creation, email sends, pipeline stage triggers. But you hit the ceiling quickly. Complex conditional logic, cross-object automations, and multi-step sequences aren’t really possible without Zapier.

Reporting and Analytics

HubSpot’s custom report builder lets you create reports across any combination of objects — contacts, companies, deals, tickets, activities. Attribution reporting shows which marketing channels drive revenue. Forecasting tools give sales managers weighted pipeline views with historical accuracy tracking.

Copper’s reporting improved significantly in 2025, but it’s still primarily pre-built reports with limited customization. If your VP of Sales wants a report showing deal velocity by lead source segmented by company size, HubSpot handles that natively. In Copper, you’re exporting to Google Sheets.

Ecosystem and Integrations

With 1,700+ integrations in the HubSpot marketplace, you can connect virtually any tool your team uses. The integrations tend to be deep, bidirectional, and maintained by the tool vendors themselves. Copper’s integration library is smaller and more focused — the Google Workspace integrations are excellent, but connecting to niche tools often requires Zapier as middleware.

Where Copper Wins

The Google Workspace Experience

This is Copper’s defining advantage, and it’s not close. Copper doesn’t just integrate with Google Workspace — it lives inside it. The Chrome extension surfaces CRM data directly in your Gmail sidebar. When you open an email from a contact, their deal history, notes, and upcoming tasks appear right there. No tab switching, no copy-pasting.

New contacts get suggested automatically based on your email and calendar activity. Copper watches who you’re communicating with and prompts you to add them to the CRM. On a team I worked with, this auto-suggestion feature captured 30% more contacts than the team had been logging manually in their previous CRM.

Google Calendar events automatically sync as activities on contact records. Shared Google Drive files link to relevant deals. The entire experience feels like Google built a CRM extension for their own suite.

Adoption Speed and User Compliance

The number one reason CRM implementations fail isn’t features — it’s adoption. Reps don’t use the tool, data goes stale, and the whole system becomes useless. Copper has a structural advantage here because there’s almost nothing new to learn.

If your team already uses Gmail, they already know 80% of Copper’s interface. I’ve seen teams go from zero to fully operational in Copper within a single afternoon. HubSpot’s basic setup is straightforward too, but getting reps to actually use all the features? That’s a multi-week project with training sessions.

For sales teams that have historically resisted CRM adoption, Copper’s invisible-in-Gmail approach is the most reliable path to consistent data entry I’ve found.

Simplicity Without Feeling Cheap

Copper made deliberate choices about what not to build, and the result is a focused tool that doesn’t overwhelm. The interface is clean and opinionated — there aren’t 15 ways to do everything. Pipeline views are straightforward. Contact records show what matters without sprawling property lists.

This isn’t a limitation for teams that need a sales CRM and nothing more. It’s a feature. Every hour your team doesn’t spend configuring dashboards or debating workflow logic is an hour they spend selling.

Price-to-Value for Small Teams

For a team of 5–15 salespeople who need pipeline management, email tracking, and basic automation, Copper Professional at $23/user/month is hard to beat. You get everything a small sales team actually uses without paying for marketing automation, service tools, and features designed for 200-person organizations.

HubSpot’s free plan is competitive here, but once you need email sequences, automated task creation, or custom reporting, you’re jumping to $100/user/month on Professional. Copper’s Professional tier covers those use cases at less than a quarter of the price.

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

Contact Management

Both CRMs handle contact and company records well, but they approach it differently. HubSpot uses a structured database model with lifecycle stages (subscriber → lead → MQL → SQL → customer), custom properties, and association labels between records. It’s powerful for teams that need to track contacts through a complex buying journey.

Copper takes a more organic approach. Contacts populate naturally from your Gmail and Calendar interactions. The system automatically logs emails, creates activity timelines, and suggests relationships based on communication patterns. There’s less manual data entry, but also less structure. If you need to track a contact’s journey through a multi-stage funnel, HubSpot’s model is stronger. If you just need a reliable record of every interaction with a person, Copper’s automatic logging is more accurate.

Pipeline Management

HubSpot supports multiple deal pipelines with customizable stages, deal properties, and required fields at each stage. The forecasting tools include weighted pipeline values, deal probability, and historical close-rate tracking. Sales managers get a comprehensive view of what’s coming.

Copper’s pipeline is visually similar — drag-and-drop Kanban boards with multiple pipeline support. It covers the fundamentals well. Where it falls short is forecasting depth and pipeline analytics. You can see what’s in each stage, but the predictive and analytical layers that HubSpot offers aren’t there.

Email Integration

Copper’s Gmail integration is the best in the CRM industry for Google Workspace users. Full stop. Every email is automatically logged, contact records appear in your sidebar, and you can update deal stages, add notes, and create tasks without leaving Gmail. It reduces the friction of CRM data entry to near zero.

HubSpot’s Gmail integration works well via a browser extension, but it’s clearly an add-on rather than a native experience. Email tracking, templates, and sequences function reliably, and the meeting scheduler (even on the free plan) is excellent. But the experience of switching between the HubSpot extension sidebar and the main HubSpot app creates a split-screen workflow that’s less fluid than Copper’s approach.

Reporting

This is a clear HubSpot win. The custom report builder supports dozens of data sources, cross-object reporting, and visualization types. Attribution models can track first-touch, last-touch, and multi-touch credit across marketing and sales activities. Dashboard sharing and scheduled email reports keep teams aligned.

Copper offers pipeline reports, activity reports, and goal tracking. The reports are clean and readable, but you can’t build complex multi-dimensional views. Most Copper power users I’ve worked with supplement their reporting by piping data into Google Sheets or Looker Studio — which, to be fair, works well since everything stays in the Google ecosystem.

Automation

HubSpot’s workflow engine handles marketing, sales, and service automations with a visual builder. You can create branching logic (if/then), set enrollment criteria across any object property, and trigger actions including internal notifications, property updates, task creation, deal stage changes, and external webhooks. On Enterprise plans, custom-coded actions let developers extend automations further.

Copper’s automation is functional but limited. You can set up triggers based on pipeline stage changes, create automatic task assignments, and send templated emails. The Professional plan includes workflow automations with multiple triggers and actions. But you won’t find branching logic, cross-pipeline automations, or the depth that HubSpot provides. For anything complex, you’ll route through Zapier or Make.

AI Features

HubSpot’s Breeze AI suite has expanded aggressively through 2025 and into 2026. It now includes AI email composition, predictive lead scoring, conversation intelligence (call transcription and analysis), content generation for marketing, and an AI assistant embedded throughout the platform. The predictive scoring, in particular, adds real value for teams with enough historical data — it identifies which leads are most likely to convert based on behavioral patterns.

Copper’s AI capabilities are more targeted. The contact suggestion engine uses machine learning to identify people you’re communicating with who aren’t in your CRM. An email drafting assistant helps compose messages from within Gmail. Relationship insights flag contacts you haven’t engaged with recently. These features are practical and well-integrated into the Google experience, but they’re narrower in scope than HubSpot’s suite.

Customization

HubSpot offers deep customization: custom objects (Enterprise), custom properties on every object type, calculated fields, custom-coded workflow actions, and a developer-friendly API. You can model complex business processes — multi-product deals, custom approval flows, partner relationship tracking — within the platform.

Copper provides custom fields, custom activity types, and configurable pipelines. That covers most small-business needs. But if your sales process doesn’t fit neatly into Copper’s contact-company-deal-pipeline model, you’ll be working around the tool’s structure rather than adapting it.

Migration Considerations

Moving from Copper to HubSpot

This is the more common migration direction as teams outgrow Copper. The good news: HubSpot has a dedicated import tool that handles CSV uploads well, and most Copper data (contacts, companies, deals, activities) maps cleanly to HubSpot objects.

The challenges are around email history and Google-specific data. Copper’s auto-logged Gmail activity doesn’t export in a format that maps 1:1 to HubSpot’s activity timeline. You’ll get the data, but it won’t feel as natural. Plan for 1–2 weeks of data cleanup after migration.

Retraining is the bigger concern. Your team goes from a zero-friction Gmail experience to a full platform with its own interface, navigation, and logic. Budget 2–4 weeks for your team to reach proficiency, and expect some grumbling from reps who loved Copper’s simplicity.

Moving from HubSpot to Copper

This is less common but happens when teams realize they’re paying for complexity they don’t use. Contact, company, and deal data migrates via CSV. Custom objects, workflow automations, and marketing assets (landing pages, email sequences, forms) don’t have equivalents in Copper, so you’ll need alternative tools.

The biggest risk is losing automation infrastructure. If your team relies on HubSpot workflows to route leads, trigger sequences, or update records, you’ll need to rebuild those processes using Copper’s simpler automations plus Zapier. Map every active workflow before you migrate.

The upside: your team will adopt Copper faster than they adopted HubSpot, and you’ll likely see higher data quality from the automatic Gmail logging.

Integration Rebuilding

Both CRMs integrate with common tools (Slack, Google Workspace, Zapier), but your specific integration stack may need rebuilding. HubSpot’s deeper native integrations with tools like Salesforce, NetSuite, and marketing platforms don’t have Copper equivalents. Document every active integration and verify Copper (or HubSpot) supports it before committing.

Our Recommendation

For Google Workspace teams under 20 people focused on sales: Copper is the better choice. The Gmail-native experience drives higher adoption, the pricing is predictable, and the simplicity means you’re selling instead of configuring software. Start with Professional at $23/user/month.

For teams planning to scale, or needing marketing + sales alignment: HubSpot is the platform to grow with. Start with the free CRM, upgrade to Starter ($20/user/month) when you need email sequences, and move to Professional when you need serious automation. Yes, it costs more. But replacing a CRM you’ve outgrown costs even more.

For budget-conscious startups (under 5 people): HubSpot’s free plan is the obvious starting point. You get a legitimate CRM at zero cost. If adoption stalls because your team won’t leave Gmail, switch to Copper.

For agencies and consulting firms deep in Google Workspace: Copper. The relationship-centric data model and automatic activity logging fit professional services workflows better than HubSpot’s marketing-heavy architecture.

The honest truth: both are good CRMs. The wrong choice isn’t picking one over the other — it’s picking either one and not getting your team to actually use it. If Gmail adoption is your biggest concern, Copper wins. If you need a platform that goes beyond sales, HubSpot wins.

Read our full HubSpot review | See HubSpot alternatives

Read our full Copper review | See Copper alternatives

Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep the site running and produce quality content.